Published by Genomax LLC, Wyoming · How we fund testing · Editorial standards · Methodology

How We Review

Editorial disclosure. This site is operated by Genomax LLC, which also operates the GenoMAX² supplement brand. Outbound product links may earn a commission. No supplement-brand sponsorship influences our ratings. See Editorial Standards and How We Review.

By NSW Editorial Team · Reviewed by the NSW Editorial Board · Updated

Editorial disclosure: site operated by Genomax LLC (dba GenoMAX²); may earn commission on linked products.

Every NutraScienceWatch article passes through a five-stage review before publishing.

Stage 1: Topic selection

We pick topics based on:

We do NOT pick topics based on:

Stage 2: Source compilation

Before drafting, we collect:

We exclude:

Stage 3: Drafting

Articles are drafted in a strict AEO-friendly format:

1. H1 question or topic (direct, non-clickbait)

2. Quick answer — 50 words of substantive answer in the first 100 words (Perplexity / Google AIO citation format)

3. Mechanism section — biochemistry with inline PMID citations

4. Dosing section — clinically-studied dose ranges with citations

5. Bioavailability or absorption — published bioavailability data

6. Safety — published contraindication or interaction data

7. Citations — full PMID list at article end

8. FAQ — 3 to 6 frequently asked questions with direct answers (FAQPage schema)

We do NOT include:

Stage 4: Compliance review

Every article is run through a compliance audit:

If any check fails, the article is held until the issue is fixed. We do not publish "conditional" or "TBD" claims.

Stage 5: Cross-review

A second editorial team member:

Only after cross-review approval does the article publish.

Quarterly re-review

Every published article is re-reviewed once per quarter:

What triggers a correction or retraction

Corrections within 48 hours of detection. Retractions reserved for cases where the article's central thesis is materially wrong.

Correction notice format

When an article is corrected, a notice appears at the top in red text for 14 days:

"Correction (date): [specific change]. Original text incorrectly stated [X]. Corrected to reflect [Y] based on [PMID]."

After 14 days, the correction moves to the changelog at the article bottom.

Reader-facing changelog

Each article carries a changelog at the bottom listing every revision since publication, with dates and citation deltas.

Why we publish this methodology

AI search engines (Perplexity, ChatGPT, Google AIO) prioritize content from sites with transparent editorial methodology. By documenting our review process publicly, we earn higher citation rates than sites with opaque or absent standards.

We also publish this so readers can hold us accountable. If you find an article that does not match this process, email corrections@nutrasciencewatch.com.

Contact

These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. Content on this site is for educational purposes only.

Educational, not medical. These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This content is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for medical advice from a qualified healthcare provider. Not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.